Let’s look at this scenario: Your product support team gets
a call from an exasperated customer who could not upgrade their environment to
the latest software version. They tried everything that the document instructed
them to do. But upgrade didn’t happen or failed. Support cannot figure that our
either. Engineering and QA representatives get on the support call and after a
lot of digging, find out that the user
is doing it all wrong. They fix it. Then they ask the user “Why are you doing
it, instead of this?” User responds, “Oh we followed the document.” Out of nowhere
you receive an email with the subject line Documentation Error. You know full
well you followed through with everyone for information. You send multiple
review requests, updated multiple review feedback. Someone even provided
feedback on this particular statement. You fixed it. And now, this
documentation error. This is a genuine situation with a customer. What do you
do?
Do you get angry, dig into your email to find the exact
email that instructed you to write what caused the problem and start a blame
game series and spend time fuming and anxious? If you say yes, I won’t be
surprised, but will ask you this. Is your anger and being upset helping you to
fix the issue and resolve the problem now? Or makes you waste your time and
others time by turning this into an unproductive negative situation? Why do you
get angry? Is this your personal book that someone is finding fault with? No.
This is a document with a purpose. If the purpose id defeated, then it doesn’t
matter where the fault is, documentation is part of the product and it is our
responsibility to fix the issue immediately.
As technical writers, we are responsible for the Integrity of information. How do we maintain the integrity of information in a
technical document?
To maintain the integrity of information, you need to make
sure you develop the right information, get it reviewed and by updating the
feedback. You also have to constantly monitoring the product during
development, touch bases with dev and QA folks to see if any changes are made
in a particular feature after you have documented that feature.
- Information Development: We may be working on a release notes, installation guide, user manual or context sensitive online help. Make sure what we write aligns exactly with what it is supposed to do. Read your FS, talk to you developers, talk to you QA, use the product (if it is SW, or if it is HW and you cannot use it, walk over to the lab and watch the QA or lab technician use it) and write the content.
- Review: After you write your first draft, follow-up and follow-through with your SMEs for reviews. Make sure they read your document and provide feedback on your content. And make sure you update your draft based on their feedback. If you are in agile environment, your initial draft will have to change a few times before the product is shipped. So make sure to periodically revisit your draft and get it reviewed and updated. For installation and upgrade related information, write, get it reviewed and find someone on your team who had not done the installation part. Ask them to use this document and install the product. Understand what issues they go through and fix it in the document.
- More review: When the document is almost close to the final stage, get in touch with you PM or TME. Request time with them to go over the document or a feature content.
All these meticulous care in writing and reviewing will make
sure the information integrity part is taken care of!
This document we publish is not our personal work of art. It
is a product of collaboration with a purpose. Our sense of ownership to this book ends with
making sure we write the right content. When there are issues in the book, this
sense of ownership must not interfere with performing our responsibility of
fixing the issue.